Small company bias Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Small company bias - Essay ExampleThe EMH maintained that a market was perfect in the sense that the information spread very fast to accommodate immediate changes in the market stock prices. However, key criticisms take for been leveled against this hypothesis based on a number of contradicting scenarios. The use of subatomic firm put has sustained the opposition and criticism for the EMH. The extensive studies undertaken among the USA small firms indicated that small firms outperformed large firms in respect of stock prices in spite of their advantageous operational economies of capital and market dominance (Edgar 31-35).Investigators have rear the strongest effect of the tendencies of small firms to generate large stock returns compared to returns on stocks of large companies. According to the survey carried out by Fanna and French (1992) on the stocks data between 1963 and 1990, they found that clearly, portfolios of small companies tended to produce higher monthly average ret urns that those made on stocks of large companies EMH (Jonathan, Jandik, and Mandelker, 17).Therefore, it is essential to examine the EMH from a wide perspective that attempts to explore the incumbent information. according to EMH, the larger the firm, the more advantageous it is in accessing and retaining important market information hence resulting in information asymmetry, hence creating an ability to benefit from the skew information compared to the small firms. It should be noted that although the results of the studies of small fir effect have tended to degenerate the meaningfulness and application of EMH, it might harbor significant flaws such as survivor bias where the researcher might have used data from small firms that survived the informational imbalances (Edgar 34).Since its inception about four decades ago, EMH has occupied a large spot in economic literature. The researches on

The differences between Eudicots and Monocots plants Coursework

The differences between Eudicots and Monocots whole caboodles - Coursework ExampleThe author has rightly presented that every plant has two main systems a stem turn system and a shoot system, a root system consists of roots and branch roots and the shoot system contains stem, branches, and leaves. Roots atomic number 18 responsible for providing the plant with water and other minerals contained in the soil. It also anchors the plants and holds the plant to the ground. The stem has the indebtedness to transport water minerals from roots to the leaves and branches and food and oxygen from leaves to other separate. Leaves carry the responsibility of making food for the plants through the process of photosynthesis. The plant can make its food by itself combining carbon-dioxide and sunlight by the process of photosynthesis. The vegetative parts of a plant are root, stem, and leaves but flowers, fruits, and seeds are its reproductive organs. Flowering plants produce seeds of two basic types, monocots, and Eudicots. There are many differences between the Monocots and Eudicots. In monocots, there is only one cotyledon in the seed but in Eudicot plants, the seed has two cotyledons. In monocot plants, the root xylem and phloem are distributed in a ring firearm in Eudicots root phloem is the xylem. In monocots, the vascular tissues are there on the stem in a scattered form but Eudicots have its vascular tissues distinctly arranged. Leaves veins in monocot plants are formed in a parallel pattern while Eudicots have a leave veins in a net shape.

What is spanglish Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

What is spanglish - Case Study ExampleLanguages are alive and they are constantly changing. Incorporating new words that are generally used is check of the logical evolution of a speech communication. But run-ins are also fate of the cultural heritage of a country that must be respected. Language is part of a countrys identity.The use of Spanglish in formal institutions must not be allowed,much less tolerated.Its inclusion in school curriculum in the interest of analyse it as a social phenomenon is acceptable merely only with the purpose of understanding todays society. The major values of a nation are expressed by its language. The first thing people identify with is the language of their country and it is the means by which they express their ideas, their values and their feelings. Language is very efficacious in that sense, as well as the accents of each region, but this is a characteristic that Spanglish will never have.Spanglish first appeared near the border of America and Mexico, where two languages lived together. The term Spanglish was coined by Salvador Ti in 1940. Although the number of people speaking Spanish in English-speaking countries is increasingly high, this does not mean that English can disappear. encyclopedism a language must be an enriching experience, which promotes conversion as well as nationality. Both English and Spanish are languages with a historic root, but Spanglish is just a mixture of two languages, which uses both in the same sentence, combining words from one and other or creating new words from the fusion of the two.A result of the collision of two languages, Spanglish takes different forms. The most basic form is code-switching, where words are substituted or inserted from one language into the other. For example, Spanglish might exit like Vamos a la store para comprar milk to mean, Lets go to the store to buy milk. A bit more complicated form is the do up of words, or basically switching between languages wi thin a word, by translating a word or phrase literally. In all cases, the resulting language or product does not bear the generally acceptable correctness of grammar rules and word usage. Spanglish is completely random. This will only lead to the bad use and the humiliation of both languages. Moreover, countries influenced by English and Spanish have the big advantage of being bilingual, and it makes no sense renouncing it to this. Mexicans usually see Spanish as a symbol of colonization. But, does Spanglish have something to do with rejecting domination, or is it more like a trendy use of language In some cases, Spanglish is the language of poor illiterate race trying to adapt to the changing situation. In other cases it is a matter of being part of the majority and using the same words as the major part of the population but, in fact, they are submitting to this majority instead of enriching their differences. The proliferation of a hybrid street language like Spanglish in domin antly English-speaking United States poses a serious threat not only to the socio-cultural aspect of the countrys development, but also to its economic and political growth. Why is Spanglish a threat to the overall development of the U.S. Foremost, the language of politics and commerce is English. In a highly globalized economy of nations, there is only one language used English. It is in no way, therefore, that a iron and fake English in the form of Spanglish can help facilitate the nations coping and rising above the challenges brought about by globalization. Secondly, it is culturally unwell for any(prenominal) nation, much less the U.S., to uphold and encourage the proliferation of languages like Spanglish as doing so would show the people and the world as a whole a leave out of healthy cultural identity. While it is understandably necessary to allow Spanglish to be used in places and in instances where it is the most convenient to use, given the growing diversity of communit ies in the United States, it is very important that the long-term benefits and losses from allowing it to prosper be considered over and above everything else. For instance, the use of Spanglish must be confined to the streets, where it in reality originated and developed. It can also be used by people in their multicultural homes and neighborhoods

A Trade Environment and the Rights of Patients Dissertation

A Trade Environment and the Rights of Patients - Dissertation ExampleRecent free trade agreements have extended extremely overgenerous patent rights to multinational pharmaceutical companies, and have limited access to generic equivalent drugs. In the DOHA declaration on TRIPS and Public Health of 2001, states that were members of the manhood Trade Organization (WTO) guaranteed that when a country is undergoing a human race health crisis, it is not bound by its patents commitments. A consensus was reached that the provisions in the WTO having to with patents should be interpret liberally in favour of the patient, and in favour of granting access to essential medicines. In order to circumvent these commitments, bilateral agreements are being forged by developed countries with lesser developed countries where the requirements for intellectual property law surpass those found in TRIPS. The TRIPS agreement does contain various safeguard mechanisms to protect common health. The two d istinct safeguards are (1) parallel importation, and (2) compulsory licensing. By, its silence, the TRIPS allows countries to import drugs from another country that is selling it at a lower price. Countries must make house servant legislation in this regard. The US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement, however, is an example of how the US has engaged in scare tactics to pressure developing countries not to pass a parallel important law. Compulsory licensing, on the other hand, permits the government to grant compulsory licenses to particular companies to create generic versions of the drug and arrest a public health crisis.

Morrie Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Morrie - Essay Exampleto always be able to look at death itself straight in the eye and compact back no matter how hopeless the situation can be and then be on the positive side of things, to look at the proximo in an optimistic way.The professors future looked short as he has only a few months left to live but he managed to touch everyone approximately him, from family, relatives, peers, colleagues, and even complete strangers who saw his interview with Ted Koppel when it was shown on television. This paper discusses the important things in liveliness worth knowing about to be happy on earth, in particular, how to live life fully by learning how to die gracefully.Despite being diagnosed with ALS with a very bad prognosis, Morrie Schwartz, the old and poorly(p) professor mentioned earlier, was fiercely determined to live a useful life. He is of the belief that dying people need not be entirely unserviceable instead he encouraged all people who knew him to come and visit him if they had the time and the inclination so he could still be available to see to their problems and perhaps give them a piece of useful advice. Morrie Schwartz was indeed a wonderful listener who can help otherwise people because he had empathy and taste by letting them unload their problems to him, he would willingly listen despite his pains from the ailment. He was fond of aphorisms, of which the statement, once you learn how to die, you learn how to live, he give tongue to (Albom 82) had a very profound meaning for everyone who will listen. What he had meant with this statement is that people looking at impending death realize how precious life and valuable is, that these people suddenly realize the importance of the idea of living life to the fullest which means enjoy life without any hesitations or reservations about what other people may think and not waste a minute of it on trivial things that do not really matter in the universal gravitational constant sweep of life.In ot her words, most people go through life as if sleep-walking, doing things

The Author of Her Book by Anne Bradstreet Essay Example for Free

The Author of Her Book by Anne Bradstreet EssayThe debate starts with an argument among two people, DeSean and Sole. Sole was trying to help DeSean through a spiritual crisis and trying to answer the question in much(prenominal) a way that it would have been treated if it were posed before rescuer, hence focusing on what saviour might have done when found in the same situation. The theological debate for this argument is How do we reconcile the fact that Jesus savior was fully God with the fact that Jesus was fully clement? Christians believe that Jesus was fully man and God at the same time, formalized by the Council of Chalcedon in AD 451. Arianism believed by the Jehovah witness is that Jesus was the first and greatest creation of God. Muslims on the other hand simply believe Jesus is just a prophet of God, but in all most people believe in Jesus Christs divinity and gentleman at the same time. A group holds Kenotic Christology which explains God had to empty himself to become fully compassionate, thus God placed is omniscience and became fully man.Two essays which offered defense of the holy Christological position and defense of the kenotic Christological position The Classical view where some Theologians agreed that Jesus was at and the same time omnipresent save spatially located omnipotent but limited in power. Some evangelicals believe that Jesus was fully God and fully human, and insist that he laid aside the use of is divine attributes in order to become a human, whiles retaining his divine holiness and love temporarily whiles slowly releasing his divine attributes. period the Paradoxical concluded that Christ God was not only God and human but, but he also exercised his divine and human attributes. The Kenotic View is such that God became a human being. This view holds the point that God the father laid down his heavenly powers and made himself avail competent hence making himself human like us. Thus, Jesus did not cease to be the Seco nd person in the Trinity but put aside his power to be able to serve his purpose on earth.This argument was supported by (25-8),explaining that even though Jesus was in the Likeness of God he did not feign advantage and make himself equal with him. And as such should be our mindset that even though Jesus came on earth us a human being, we should make ourselves equal with him as his spiritual attributes is still in place. Jesus did not have an idea about what was going to happen as in when he was going to return but still kept his duties on earth.As he left his riches, thus he who once rich became execrable so we could become rich, the kenotic View gives believers a logical reason for Jesus being human and God as compared to Christology. It also makes believers take Jesus earthly concern on a more serious level. Even with tis view there were objection made about the Kenotic view such the undermining of Christs divinity, how Jesus did his miraculous deeds if its said he did not hav e his divine power and Pauls interest in metaphysical.

Old Wise Men Essay Example for Free

Old Wise Men EssayDo all old men truly de dier firmness because they can delay their death on the horizon? Wisdom is a valued trait in our society today. In both(prenominal) tabby Lear by William Shakespeargon and Tuesdays with Morrie by Mitch Albom, the main characters were able to acquire wisdom after undergoing trials and tribulations. However, both of these men began their quest as completely diverse people. Morrie always emphatic the value of family and of love, while great power Lear saw these qualities that could be used to boot his ego. Morrie was disappointed by the way things were in society, while King Lear did non c everyplace much about it and accepted it the way it was. Morrie viewed death as a natural thing and an ideal way to live, while King Lear still valued to live life sentence as a King despite giving and dividing his land between his daughters. Regardless of being very different character impertinent and beliefs, both King Lear and Morrie came to achieve wisdom by experiencing the fact of life otherwisewise known as death.Both of these men differed in their values when it came to the life concept. Morrie believed that it was better to perish than to live a life without love, where he quoted If you dont have the support and loveand caring and concern that you get from a family, you dont have much at all. Love is so supremely important. As our great poet Auden spoke Love each other or perish(Albom 91). This quote shows Morries view of love and has the opinion that it is better to draw than to live a life without love. Although Morrie grew up with low love in his life, this is the reason why he emphasized the importance of love and family to him. Contrarily, King Lear believed that family only existed to serve his needs.Tell me, my daughters, since now we will divest us both of rule, inte tolerate of territory, cares of state which of you shall we say doth love us most that we outlargest bounty may extend where nature dot h with merit challenge? (I.I.47-53). This quote illustrates King Lears feeling towards family. He set against his daughters against each other for his benefit. His love was conditional, even though Cordelia was his known favourite between his daughters he warned her. How, how, Cordelia? Mend your pitch a little, lest you may mar your fortunes. (I.I.94-95).This quote shows the fact that he believed that love in a family that is one-sided, he should only receive love but should not give any. On the contrary, Morries love for this family was unconditional and a two-way street. However, Lear realized the value of unconditional love when Cordelia returned despite after disowning and blaspheming her but he was too late. While Morrie learned the value of love by dint of the lack of having it earlier o in his life, King Learwould learn it through the death of his daughter. Both cherish family and life more after coming to terms with the concept of death, and realize the trouble of their society.Both King Lear and Morrie Schwartz also had different perspectives on life and society. King Lear accepted the ranking of his society, of course, since he was the peak of the great chain of being. All I ask is that you provide me with a hundred knights for my own entourage. Ill keep only the title of king (I.I.136-138). This quote depicts King Lears view of society and that he comes before the rest of society, depriving 100 knights form society for his benefit. Morrie, on the other hand, was disgusted with how his society was so materialistic. A quote from Tuesdays with Morrie, Do you know how they brainwash people? They fictionalise something over and over again.And thats what we do in this country. Owning things is good. More money is good. More property is good. More commercialism is goodwe repeat it and have it repeated to us-over and over until nobody bother to even think other wise (Albom 124). This quote demonstrates the disgust Morrie has with society and how it co nstantly promotes materialism rather than important values such as love, which is showed in this quote You know how I always interpreted that? These people were so hungry for love that they were accepting substitutes (Albom 125). This quote shows that Morrie believes that people arematerialistic because of a lack of love within their lives. Furthermore, King Lear realizes the disorder of his society during his hardships. Thou rascal beadle, hold thy bloody hand. Why dost thou concussion that whore? Strip thine own back Thou hotly lustst to use her in that kind for which thou whippst her. The usurer hangs the cozener. (IV.VI.152-57).This shows both his disgust of the companionable customs of his time and how it favors the rich and frowns upon the poor. Lear regrets not being a just king and mistreating the poor people because he was too greedy. He bawled unforesightful naked wretches, wheresoer you are, that bide the pelting of this pitiless storm, how shall your houseless heads and unfed sides, your looped and windowed raggedness, defend you from seasons such as these? Oh, I have taen too little care of this (III.IV.30-34). Although Morrie was aware of the problems within his society and always fought against them, Lear only came to this conclusion and earn this wisdom through these tribulations.Morrie and Lear had contradicting views of death before they acquired their wisdom. First of all, Lear believed that he would die as a king and even with his old age he believed death was far in the distance, proven in the quote All I ask is that you provide me with hundred knights for my own entourage. Ill keep only the title of king (I.I.136-138). Lear did not believe in preparing for his death or verbalism goodbye to loved ones, as he still wanted to live like a king even after diving his kingdomand wealth. On the contrary, Morrie believed that death should be accepted in life. Oh yes, you strip away all that stuff and you focus on the essentials. When you real ize you are going o die, you see everything much differentlyLearn how to die, and you learn how to live(Albom 83). This quote shows that Morrie though if more people lived as if they were going to die at any moment, then the world could be a more positive place.Morrie was also very optimistic and grateful for his disease and how long he had to say goodbye to everyone he cherished. Its surly to watch my body wilt away to nothing. But its also wonderful because of all the time I get to saygood-bye. (Albom 57) On the other hand, King Lear was coming to terms with his mortality. When Gloucester asked to kiss his hand he replied Let me wipe it first, it smells of mortality. (IV.VI.125-126). It shows that Lear found his new humbleness and acceptance through death.Morrie and Lear both achieved wisdom by coming to terms with their deaths. King Lear and Morrie Schwartz are very much alike, although they were completely different people before they acquired their wisdom. They were both able to attain perceptivity and satisfaction through difficult hardships and becoming aware of the problems that are in their society. They have learned that if more people are aware of death and live everyday as if they were to die tomorrow, they would have more fulfillingand satisfying lives. Through acquiring wisdom they realized the importance of their family, and love. They only differed in respect where Lear is change with regret while Morrie gains a higher appreciation for it. Death is something that we all must accept and Lear and Morrie finally embrace it.